Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Conoco, Inc. v. Fortune Production Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 29, 1998No. 01-97-00547-CVPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

TAFT, Justice.

This appeal arises from a dispute about natural gas contracts. Appellees, Fortune Production Co. (Fortune), Tucker Drilling Co., Inc. (Tucker), Curtis Hankamer Corp. (Hankamer), and John L. Cox sued appellant, Conoco Inc. (Conoco), for breach of contract, fraud in the inducement, reformation, conversion, and unjust enrichment. In accordance with the jury’s verdict, judgment was rendered against Conoco for $894,673 in unjust enrichment damages plus prejudgment interest. We address whether: (1) the trial court erred in allowing appellees to recover for unjust enrichment;…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Sterner v. Marathon Oil Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Black Lake Pipe Line Co. v. Union Construction Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Lofton v. Texas Brine Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Greenhalgh v. Service Lloyds Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Sherman v. First National Bank in CenterTexas Supreme Court · 1988

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Fortune Production Co. v. Conoco, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Anna Liza N. Cristobal v. Frederick Scott Allen, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2010
  3. Barry C. Dockery v. Office of the Attorney General of Texas and Rosalind Wykoff, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2005
  4. Barry C. Dockery v. Office of the Attorney General of Texas and Rosalind Wykoff, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2005
  5. Fortune Production Co. v. Conoco, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API