McLaren v. Fleischer
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Riverside County. F. E. Densmore, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtLawlor, J.
This appeal was taken from a judgment of the superior court of Riverside County dismissing plaintiff’s complaint after a general demurrer was sustained and the plaintiff refused to amend.
The action was brought by the plaintiff against the defendant to procure a decree in equity declaring that the defendant holds the title to a certain quarter-section of land in trust for the plaintiff, requiring the defendant to convey title to the plaintiff, and for the value of the use of the land for the period set forth in the complaint. The prayer, of the complaint is based on allegations to the effect…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hastings & Dakota Railroad v. WhitneySupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Quinby v. ConlanSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Gage v. GuntherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- Whittaker v. PendolaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Chapman v. QuinnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Phoenix Mutual Life Insurance v. BrainardMontana Supreme Court · 1928
- Crowder v. LyleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- Begue v. Grizzly Live Stock & Land Co.District Court, S.D. California · 1932
- United States v. 348.62 Acres of LandDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1943
- Bowen v. HickeyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.