Legal Opinion
Moldea v. New York Times Company
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided January 31, 1992No. Civ. A. 90-2053PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
JOHN GARRETT PENN, Chief Judge.
This case is before the Court on plaintiff, Dan E. Moldea’s Motion to Amend Complaint.
After responsive pleadings have been filed “a party may amend [his] pleading only by leave of Court or by written consent of the adverse party; and leave shall be freely given when justice so requires.” Fed.R.Civ.P. 15(a).
Plaintiff seeks to “amend his complaint to add a new additional cause of action for breach of contract, negligent misrepresentation, promissory estoppel and interference with prospective business rela-tions_” Motion to Amend at 1. It is settled that where…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Cohen v. Cowles Media Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Wilderness Society, a Non-Profit Corporation v. J. Steven Griles, Assistant Secretary, Department of InteriorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
3Cited by8 opinions
- Dan E. Moldea v. New York Times CompanyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994
- Dan E. Moldea v. New York Times CompanyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994
- James Madison Project v. Department of JusticeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Hill v. U.S. Department of DefenseDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Kemin Foods, L.C. v. Pigmentos Vegetales Del Centro S.A. De C.V.District Court, S.D. Iowa · 2005
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.