Legal Opinion

Cannamore v. Bi-State Development Agency

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided May 25, 1971No. 33794PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

WEIER, Commissioner.

Plaintiff, a fare-paying passenger, fell while she was leaving defendant’s bus at the intersection of Taylor and Easton Avenues in the City of St. Louis. As compensation for personal injuries plaintiff sought and obtained a verdict against the defendant in the sum of $9,000.00, on which the court entered judgment. Defendant’s motion for directed verdict at the close of all the evidence had been overruled by the trial judge at the conclusion of the testimony ; but, upon after-trial motion, the court set aside the verdict and judgment previously entered and sustained…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. McCloskey Ex Rel. McCloskey v. KoplarSupreme Court of Missouri · 1932
  2. Brassfield v. SearsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1967
  3. Parlow v. Carson-Union-May-Stern CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1958
  4. Anderson v. Orscheln Bros. Truck Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1965
  5. Effinger v. Bank of St. LouisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1971

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Cannamore v. Bi-State Development AgencySupreme Court of Missouri · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API