Legal Opinion
Harry Carr v. Federal Trade Commission
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided March 21, 1962No. 5818_1PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ALDRICH, Circuit Judge.
This is a petition to review an order of the Federal Trade Commission. Petitioner, a garnetter of wool, has been ordered to cease and desist from misbranding garnetted material with respect to the source of the constituent fibers, and from failing to affix labels disclosing the presence of certain ingredients. It is not actively disputed that petitioner labeled certain bales of garnett as containing 80 per cent camel hair and 20 per cent wool when m fact the percentages were more nearly reversed. The Commission also found that the bales contained reprocessed wool.1 This…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Hartranft v. WiegmannSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Tide Water Oil Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Patton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
3Cited by11 opinions
- Perrine v. EI DU PONT DE NEMOURS AND CO.West Virginia Supreme Court · 2010
- Sutliffe v. Epping School DistrictDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2008
- United States v. KlotzCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1974
- Local No. 1505 International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers v. Local Lodge No. 1836 of District 38 of the International Ass'n of MachinistsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1962
- Araujo v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.