Legal Opinion
Sutliffe v. Epping School District
District Court, D. New Hampshire
Decided April 4, 2008No. Civil 06-cv-474-JLPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
JOSEPH N. LAPLANTE, District Judge.
The defendants, who include municipal agencies, officials, and employees of the town of Epping, New Hampshire, have moved under Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure to dismiss the bulk of the plaintiffs’ second amended complaint, which alleges violations of their constitutional rights to free speech and equal protection. The defendants argue that the plaintiffs’ claims are, variously, barred by res judicata, collateral and judicial estoppel, the Rooker-Feldman doctrine, 1 and the statute of limitations; have been brought by parties…
2Cases cited50 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Sutliffe v. Epping School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2009
- Nicole Alward v. Emery Johnston, M.D. & a.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2018
- Sutliffe v. EppingDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2008
- Krishnan v. Blueprint Healthcare LLCDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2021
- LeBlanc v. AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 2025
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.