Stockmen's Nat'l Bank of Casper v. Lukis Candy Co.
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Kimball, Chief Justice.
Respondent, the Stockmen’s National Bank of Cas-per, was plaintiff; appellants, Pete Thomas and Denver Soda Fountain Company, were interpleaders, in an action brought by plaintiff against the Lukis Candy Company and the Princess Confectionery Company, corporations, defendants. Hereinafter the parties will be referred to as plaintiff, interveners and defendants; the defendants, when separately mentioned, as the Lukis Company and the Princess Company. Plaintiff, as mortgagee, claimed a first lien on property of defendants by virtue of a chattel mortgage executed by the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Etheridge v. SperrySupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Boswell v. First National Bank of LaramieWyoming Supreme Court · 1907
- Eastman v. ParkinsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1907
- First National Bank of Sheridan v. Citizens' State Bank of DubuqueWyoming Supreme Court · 1902
- Harney v. MontgomeryWyoming Supreme Court · 1923
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In Re SpencerUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. South Carolina · 2006
- In re Aerocolor, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 1964