Legal Opinion

Smead v. Granger

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided December 27, 1984No. 13542PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PREWITT, Chief Judge.

After a default judgment was taken against defendant he filed a motion to set it aside. The trial court refused to do so and defendant appealed. By filing his motion defendant preserved a right of appeal. See Vonsmith v. Vonsmith, 666 S.W.2d 424 *574(Mo. banc), retransferred, 666 S.W.2d 426 (Mo.App.1984).

Defendant has two points relied on. We first discuss his contention that the trial court lacked jurisdiction to render the judgment because the return of service of process was defective. The return recites that defendant was served in Allegheny County, Pennsylvania by a…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Vonsmith v. VonsmithSupreme Court of Missouri · 1984
  2. Crouch v. CrouchSupreme Court of Missouri · 1982
  3. Sullenger v. Cooke Sales & Service Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1983
  4. Industrial Personnel Corp. v. CorcoranMissouri Court of Appeals · 1981
  5. Vonsmith v. VonsmithMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Friedman v. Caring Group, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1988
  2. Hellwege v. LambMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API