Legal Opinion
Rider v. Hammell
Supreme Court of Kansas
Decided December 7, 1901No. 12,421PublishedCited by 10 opinions
Error from Bourbon district court; Walter L. Simons, judge.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Greene, J. :
O. T. Hammell and D. F. McCarty, partners as Hammell & McCarty, commenced this *734action in the district court of Bourbon county, against E. P. McCarty and S. W. Rider, as partners, to recover the sum of $145.48, alleged to be due said plaintiffs on account of certain coal furnished to the defendant E. P. McCarty, at Bronson, Kan., and by him used in operating a machine in boring for oil, coal, gas, etc.
It was alleged in the petition that S. W. Rider was a partner of McCarty in the work that was being carried on at Bronson, and therefore…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Richardson v. . HughittNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
- Webster v. John Clark, Son & Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1894
- Spaulding v. StubbingsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1893
- Clifton v. HowardSupreme Court of Missouri · 1886
- Seabury & Johnson v. BollesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1888
3Cited by10 opinions
- McKallip v. GeeseSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
- Simmons v. ShaftSupreme Court of Kansas · 1914
- Wagner v. ButtlesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1912
- Sutton v. SchaffSupreme Court of Kansas · 1919
- Farmers Co-Operative Elevator Co. v. Farmers Union Co-Operative ExchangeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.