Legal Opinion

Harnish v. Joseph J. Naples & Associates, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 13, 1992PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

— Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs in accordance with the following Memorandum: Supreme Court erred in denying defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Defendant met its burden of establishing, by the submission of proof in evidentiary form, its entitlement to judgment as a matter of law. Defendant demonstrated that it strictly followed the clear and explicit instructions of the agent of its insured, who acted with the authority and consent of the insured, to direct cancellation of the insured’s garage liability policy.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Zuckerman v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. Wechsler v. PeopleNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
  3. Blonsky v. Allstate InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Oathout v. JohnsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
  5. Bulger v. Tri-Town Agency, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Murphy v. KuhnNew York Court of Appeals · 1997
  2. Wied v. New York Central Mutual Fire InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  3. Rogers v. UrbankeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  4. Brownstein v. Travelers CompaniesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API