Legal Opinion

Ingram v. Cedar Springs Federal Credit Union

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided May 16, 1984No. Civ. 4096PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRADLEY, Judge.

This is a Federal Truth-in-Lending Act case.

Cedar Springs Federal Credit Union brought suit against William Ingram to recover on a promissory note. Defendant filed an answer and counterclaim in which he alleged that plaintiff had violated the Federal Truth-in-Lending Act, 15 U.S.C.A. § 1601 et seq. (West 1982), and Federal Regulation Z, 12 C.F.R. § 226.1 et seq. (1983).

The trial court entered judgment in favor of plaintiff for $7,405.19. Defendant filed a motion for clarification or for findings of fact and conclusions of law.

On October 20, 1983 the trial court amended its…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Manning v. Princeton Consumer Discount Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
  2. Wood Acceptance Co. v. KingAppellate Court of Illinois · 1974
  3. Merchandise Nat'l Bk. of Chicago v. ScanlonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980
  4. Jones v. Seldon's Furniture Warehouse, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1973
  5. Smith v. TroyanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ivey v. VerbeckCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1984
  2. Edwards v. Alabama Farm Bureau Mutual Casualty Insurance Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API