Mattingly v. District of Columbia
Supreme Court of the United States
Appeal from the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia. The facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court · StrongJustice Strong
The facts of this case appear in the bill, the answer, and the accompanying, exhibits. So far as it is necessary to restate them now, they are as follows: —
In the year 1871, the board of public works of the District of Columbia, a board constituted under and by virtue of the organic law of the District, caused to be constructed a sewer in and along the line of- Seventh Street, in the city of Washington, extending from Virginia Avenue to the Potomac Diver. They also caused the street and sidewalks to be paved, and. curbstones at the gutters to be set. The work had been commenced by the…
Also in this document: Opinion of the Court · Strong.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Cohens v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1821
3Cited by98 opinions
- Palmore v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Bauman v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Capital Traction Co. v. HofSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- Shoemaker v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- French v. Barber Asphalt Paving Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1901
93 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.