Legal Opinion

McClain v. Buck

California Supreme Court

Decided September 1, 1887No. 11671PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from an order of the Superior Court of Solano County refusing a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtThornton, J.

— This action was brought to recover damages for the conversion by defendant of certain personal property described as “ all that certain lot of printing material situated in the town of Vacaville, Solano County, California,, and known and described as the Vacaville Reporter or Judicion newspaper material.”

At the trial, it appeared that plaintiff sold the property in question, with other property, to one Raleigh Barcar, on the tenth day of October, 1884. The purchase price was $1,250, of which $500 was paid down, and for the balance Barcar executed to plaintiff two promissory notes, one for…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Duff v. DuffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Barrett-Hicks Co. v. GlasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1910
  3. In Re Kang Jin HwangUnited States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California · 2008
  4. Cohen v. MitchellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API