Legal Opinion

Hill v. Van Sant

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided March 5, 1943No. Docket 149/50PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The bill of complaint presents two causes of action. One seeks construction of the will of Frederick Nelson Groscup, deceased, and the other partition of the real property of which he died seized. Testator's estate consists entirely of personal property, with the exception of the dwelling wherein he resided prior to his death.

The second cause of action falls if by a proper construction of the will the executors named therein have by implication the power to sell the real estate.

The pertinent parts of the will are:

"Seventh Also to the above, Henry P. Aliotti, I bequeath fifteen (15) shares of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Chandler v. ThompsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1901
  2. Brown v. Fidelity Trust Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1913
  3. Moore v. WearsNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1917
  4. Executors of Vanness v. JacobusNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1864
  5. Haggerty v. LantermanNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1878

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hanson v. LevyNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1947
  2. Ryder v. RyderNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1945
  3. Bostock v. DenninNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1944
  4. Goeke v. PiersonNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1948
  5. Noren v. SillitoeNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API