Legal Opinion

Wilhelm v. Locklar

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided June 15, 1903PublishedCited by 13 opinions

This case was decided by Division B. Appeal from Circuit Court for Lee county. The facts in the case are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtCockrell, J.

This is an appeal from a decree setting aside as fraudulent certain deeds from one N. L. Langford to the Wilhelms and from the Wilhelms to Mary M. Tyre, then the wife of the said N. L. Langford. Upon application of the said Langford there has been allowed a severance and dismissal as to him. The realty involved consists o'f a lot 105 by 248 feet in the town of Fort Myers, alleged in the answer to have been the homestead of the Langfords at the time of said conveyances.

We need consider but two questions in the case before us. Did the indebtedness to complainants’ intestate constitute an…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Murphy v. FarquharSupreme Court of Florida · 1897
  2. Loftis v. LoftisTennessee Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Lewton v. HowerSupreme Court of Florida · 1882
  4. Epstein & Bro. v. M. Ferst & Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1895
  5. Olson v. NelsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1859

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Palm Beach Sav. & Loan Ass'n v. FishbeinSupreme Court of Florida · 1993
  2. Kroier v. KroierSupreme Court of Florida · 1928
  3. Havoco of America, Ltd. v. HillCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1999
  4. Perry v. BeckermanSupreme Court of Florida · 1957
  5. Graham v. AzarSupreme Court of Florida · 1967

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API