Legal Opinion

Probst, Receiver v. Spitznagle

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided February 20, 1939No. 27,194PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShake, J.

Appellee recovered a judgment in damages against the appellant in an action for personal injuries. The complaint was predicated on the Federal Safety Appliance Act (U. S. C. A. Title 45, §§1 to 46), and the negligence charged was that the top of a box car had thereon some wet or slippery substance which had adhered to appellee’s shoes as he walked thereon in the discharge of his duties as a freight train conductor; that in climbing down from said car by means of grab irons attached thereto, appellee was caused to slip and fall by reason of said substance on his shoes, thereby suffering…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. City of Decatur v. EadyIndiana Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Pennsylvania Co. v. DonatSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  3. Mappin v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. FaustIndiana Court of Appeals · 1925

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Canfield v. SandockIndiana Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Hayes Freight Lines, Inc. v. WilsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Zimmerman v. MooreIndiana Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. American Employers' Insurance v. CornellIndiana Supreme Court · 1948
  5. New York Central Railroad Co. v. KnollIndiana Court of Appeals · 1965

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API