Legal Opinion
Rapp v. NaphCare Inc
District Court, W.D. Washington
Decided October 17, 2023No. 3:21-cv-05800Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 10 AT TACOMA 11 JOHN RAPP, et al., CASE NO. 3:21-cv-05800-DGE 12 Plaintiffs, ORDER ON PLAINTIFFS’ 13 v. MOTION FOR ATTORNEY FEES (DKT. NO. 203) 14 NAPHCARE INC, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 I INTRODUCTION 18 This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiffs’ Motion for Attorney Fees. (Dkt. No. 19 203.) Having considered Plaintiffs’ motion, the exhibits and declarations attached thereto, and 20 the remainder of the record, the Court GRANTS in part Plaintiffs’ motion and awards attorney 21 fees in the amount of…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Gates v. DeukmejianCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Julie Chalmers v. City of Los Angeles, a Municipal CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Martin Gonzalez, Sr. v. City of MaywoodCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Nancy Lee Ferland v. Conrad Credit Corp., a California Corporation Gregg A. michel,ph.d., an Individual Does 1-20, InclusiveCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- McCown v. City of FontanaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.