Williams v. White Mountain Construction Co.
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partMullarkey, Justice
I agree with the holdings of sections III and IV of the majority opinion that White Mountain had no right to contribution from Permanent Builders and that the Compensation Act is constitutional. I therefore join in the majority opinion as it relates to those matters. However, I cannot agree that summary judgment should have been granted on the issue of whether an oral contract of indemnity was created and therefore dissent from section II of the majority opinion.
This case is before us on review of the district court’s order granting a motion for summary judgment filed by Permanent Builders,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Ginter v. Palmer & Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1978
- KN Energy, Inc. v. Great Western Sugar Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1985
- Ruth Williams v. Jessie Eugene Chick, Jr., and Pacific Mutual Door Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1967
- Blue Cross of Western New York v. BukulmezSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987
- Council for the Hearing Impaired Long Island, Inc. v. AmbachDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1985
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.