Legal Opinion
Eugene A. Fischer v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided April 4, 2002No. 98-1803PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KANNE, Circuit Judge.
Eugene Fischer seeks habeas relief from his conviction of being the principal administrator of a continuing criminal enterprise (CCE), alleging that his conviction was obtained in violation of Richardson v. United States, 526 U.S. 813, 119 S.Ct. 1707, 143 L.Ed.2d 985 (1999). The district court denied habeas relief, and we affirm.
I. History
Over thirteen years ago, Fischer was convicted of violating 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and 846 by conspiring to distribute more than 300 tons of marijuana. The jury also found that Fischer had participated as a principal administrator,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Bousley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Bailey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Richardson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Rutledge v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Robert Dale Murr v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Royce Brown v. John F. CarawayCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
- United States v. Chang HongCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
- United States v. ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2010
- Walker v. TrueCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2003
- Ryan v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.