Legal Opinion

Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. Nacchia

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided July 20, 1993PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOLLAND, Justice:

This is an interlocutory appeal. 1 It involves a dispute between an insurer, the defendant-appellant, Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company (“Nationwide”), and its insured, Columbus C. Nacchia, III, and Deborah A. Nacchia (the “Nacchias”). At issue is the construction of underinsured motorist coverage in the automobile insurance policy purchased by the Nacchias from Nationwide.

The Superior Court held that the Nacchi-as were eligible to pursue a recovery of underinsured motorist benefits from Nationwide, notwithstanding the terms of the release executed by the Nacchias in favor…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Uptegraft v. Home Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1983
  2. Travelers Indemnity Co. v. LakeSupreme Court of Delaware · 1991
  3. Furek v. University of DelawareSupreme Court of Delaware · 1991
  4. Silvers v. Horace Mann InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
  5. Nottingham Partners v. DanaSupreme Court of Delaware · 1989

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Farmers Alliance Mutual Insurance v. HolemanMontana Supreme Court · 1998
  2. West American Insurance v. PopaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1998
  3. Beal v. Allstate Insurance Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2010
  4. Darby v. MathisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1994
  5. Matsuura v. Alston & BirdCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API