Legal Opinion
Bosko v. Pitts & Still, Inc.
Washington Supreme Court
Decided May 1, 1969No. 39456PublishedCited by 51 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHill, J.
Nick Bosko, Russell G. Davis and John F. Heard, dba Bosko Engineering Company (hereinafter Bosko), brought this action against Pitts & Still, Inc., a gérieral insurance agency, 1 and an unknown underwriter at Lloyd’s of London (hereinafter Lloyd’s) for the failure of the insurer to pay claims and defend an action arising from the activities of Bosko in the construction of a sewer line.
In the spring of 1962, Bosko had entered into a contract with the city of TacQma for the construction of. a sewer line. Under the contract, Bosko was required to take out insurance-to cover any claims arising…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1957
- Evans v. Continental Casualty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1952
- Lawrence v. Northwest Casualty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1957
- Hill v. Great Northern Life InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1936
- Labberton v. General Casualty Co. of AmericaWashington Supreme Court · 1958
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- Hayden v. Mutual of Enumclaw InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 2000
- Hayden v. Mutual of Enumclaw Ins. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2000
- Greer v. Northwestern National InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1987
- Gruol Construction Co. v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1974
- Viani v. Aetna Insurance CompanyIdaho Supreme Court · 1972
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.