Legal Opinion
Minster State Bank v. Heirholzer (In Re Heirholzer)
United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided July 28, 1994No. 19-60217PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
RICHARD L. SPEER, Bankruptcy Judge.
This cause comes before the Court upon the Motions for Summary Judgment filed by the Defendant and Plaintiff. The Court has reviewed the written arguments of Counsel, supporting memoranda, and exhibits, as well as the entire record in the case. Based upon that review, and for the following reasons, this Court finds that the Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment should be Granted and Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment should be Denied.
FACTS
In December of 1988, David Heirholzer (hereafter “Defendant”) executed a promissory…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- In Re PetersenUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Colorado · 1990
- In Re GardnerUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maine · 1986
- Button v. Sheridan Oil Co. (In Re Button)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. New York · 1982
- In Re WhitmerUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 1992
- Lindale National Bank v. Artzt (In Re Artzt)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Texas · 1992
3Cited by24 opinions
- Republic Bank of California, N.A. v. Getzoff (In Re Getzoff)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Cherry v. Arendall (In Re Cherry)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · 2000
- Watson v. Shandell (In Re Watson)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Matter of ArnoldUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Alabama · 1997
- Watkins v. Guardian Loan Co. of Massapequa (In Re Watkins)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 1999
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.