Legal Opinion

Union Pacific Railroad Company, a Corporation v. Teles Hormaechea and Mary Hormaechea, Husband and Wife, and Daniel T. Hormaechea

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided November 10, 1969No. 22869PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JAMESON, District Judge.

Appellant, Union Pacific Railroad Company, has appealed from a judgment in a diversity action in favor of appellees, Daniel T. Hormaechea, a minor, and his parents, Teles Hormaechea and Mary Hormaechea, for personal injuries sustained by Daniel in a train-automobile collision, and expenses incurred by his parents in treatment for the injuries.

The case was tried before a jury. At the close of plaintiffs’ case and again at the close of all the evidence, appellant moved for a directed verdict. Both motions were denied. The jury returned a verdict in favor of Daniel for…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Fleenor v. Oregon Short Line RailroadIdaho Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Nagel v. HammondIdaho Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Stowers v. Union Pac. R. Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Ralph v. Union Pacific Railroad CompanyIdaho Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Whiffin v. Union Pacific RailroadIdaho Supreme Court · 1939

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Richard W. Neely v. St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company and Standard Oil Company of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
  2. David v. Longenecker v. General Motors Corporation, a Corporation, Sharon Longenecker v. General Motors CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API