Legal Opinion
Sudit v. Labin
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 22, 2017No. 2015-01714PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In an action to foreclose a mortgage, the defendants Chaim Lax and First Meridian Mortgage appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Schmidt, J.), dated October 14, 2014, which granted the plaintiffs motion to extend a notice of pendency.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The facts underlying this action are stated in our decision and order on a related appeal (see Sudit v Labin, 148 AD3d 1073 [2017] [decided herewith]), and are supplemented here only as necessary.
The plaintiff filed successive notices of pendency on the subject property to preserve his interests…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- In Re the Estate of SakowNew York Court of Appeals · 2002
- Sprague v. . CochranNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
- Sudit v. LabinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- Citibank, N.A. v. KenneyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
3Cited by7 opinions
- Nationstar Mortgage LLC v. DessingueAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- Bank of Am., N.A. v. GreenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022
- Bank of N.Y. Mellon Trust Co., N.A. v. HudsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2025
- Deutsche Bank National Trust Co. v. DawNew York Supreme Court · 2017
- U.S. Bank N.A. v. KoteiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2026
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.