Legal Opinion

Deutsche Bank National Trust Co. v. Daw

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 10, 2017Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Denis J. Butler, J.

It is ordered that this unopposed motion is determined as follows:

Plaintiff in this foreclosure action was granted a judgment of foreclosure and sale by memorandum decision dated August 9, 2016, and judgment dated January 27, 2017.

Plaintiff now moves unopposed for an order directing that plaintiff’s second notice of pendency against the subject real property, filed on June 2, 2016, be “successively filed, nunc pro tunc back to the date of expiration of the prior notice of pendency on October 28, 2013.” However, plaintiff does not articulate why it seeks…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cornell v. CornellNew York Court of Appeals · 1959
  2. Gletzer v. HarrisNew York Court of Appeals · 2009
  3. Sudit v. LabinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API