Legal Opinion

Ho Tong v. Hope

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided February 17, 1917No. 974PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Error to District Magistrate op Honolulu.

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

COKE, J.

Plaintiffs in error bring a writ of error for the purpose of correcting certain alleged errors of law committed by the district court of Honolulu, directed particularly to the action of the district court in sustaining defendant’s demurrer to plaintiffs’ first cause of action set out in their complaint..

Plaintiffs brought an action of assumpsit in the district court of Honolulu against the defendant setting forth in their complaint several causes of action. The first cause of *604action, and the only one with which we have to deal in this opinion, is based upon a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Coombs & Powell v. RogersHawaii Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Hawaii Mill Co. v. AndradeHawaii Supreme Court · 1902
  3. McKeague v. HelenHawaii Supreme Court · 1872

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Yee Hop v. Young Sak ChoHawaii Supreme Court · 1920

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API