Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Windeknecht v. Mesmer

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided October 5, 2017No. SC 96159, No. SC 96160, No. SC 96165, No. SC 96187PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORIGINAL PROCEEDINGS IN HABEAS CORPUS

2Per curiam

Stephanie Windeknecht, Joshua Holman, Summer Robinson, and Scarlett R. Adams (collectively, “Petitioners”) were each charged pursuant to section 570.030.3(1)1 with a class C felony for stealing property worth $500 dollars or more but less than $25,000 dollars; Each pleaded guilty and was sentenced to either six or seven years’ imprisonment based on the felony classification. Petitioners, who are each still incarcerated,2 now seek habe-as corpus relief, relying on this Court’s decision in State v. Bazell, 497 S.W.3d 263 (Mo. banc 2016) (per curiam).…

3Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Wainwright v. StoneSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. State of Missouri v. Amanda N. BazellSupreme Court of Missouri · 2016
  3. State v. SmithSupreme Court of Missouri · 2017
  4. State v. NunleySupreme Court of Missouri · 2011
  5. State v. PassleyMissouri Court of Appeals · 2012

4Cited by41 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Zahnd v. Van AmburgSupreme Court of Missouri · 2017
  2. State ex rel. Fite v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 2017
  3. Watson v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018
  4. Bosworth v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018
  5. Abrams v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API