Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Randleston

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided May 29, 1996No. 96-K-0069Published

1Dissent

| iBYRNES, Judge,

Dissenting With Reasons.

I respectfully dissent.

The trial court did not make a proper finding to show that the imposition of the statutorily mandated sentence would be excessive.

In State v. Hyorth, 95-1181 (La.App. 4 Cir. 9/15/95), 661 So.2d 1059, this court clearly abused its discretion by sentencing the defendant below the minimum under La R.S. 15:529.1. This court pointed out the acute severity of the crimes which involved the possibility of great bodily harm or death to the victims because the perpetrator had convictions for armed robberies. This court noted that when the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. HoganSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1985
  2. State v. HyorthLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1995
  3. State v. WashingtonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API