State ex rel. Wisconsin University Building Corp. v. Bareis
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFairchild, J.
The problem presented to the board of review at its hearing on the confirmation of the assessment was as to the ownership of the particular property sought to be taxed. It has been ruled too often to permit doubting now that exemptions from taxation are acceptable when the property has been acquired and used by and for the benefit of the state. Taking property out from among the assessables and using it in a qualified and warranted service has the support of the doctrine that property owned by a state is *501exempt from taxation. There is authority for that policy long recognized in this state:…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Loomis v. CallahanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1928
- Aberg v. MoeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1929
- Armory Realty Co. v. OlsenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
- Ford Hydro-Electric Co. v. Town of AuroraWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
- May v. Van Drisse Motors, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1929
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Thomson v. GiesselWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955
- Satterlee v. Gulf Coast Waste Disposal AuthorityTexas Supreme Court · 1978
- Mitchell Aero, Inc. v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
- American Motors Corp. v. City of KenoshaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
- Friendship Village of Greater Milwaukee, Inc. v. City of MilwaukeeCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1993
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.