Legal Opinion

Pinecrest Village, Inc. v. MacMillan

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided May 21, 1997PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFried, J.

The plaintiff, Pinecrest Village, Inc., sought a declaratory judgment in the Superior Court that G. L. c. 148, § 261, did not require the installation of an automatic sprinkler system in townhouse condominium complexes that it was building. The Superior Court granted summary judgment in favor of the defendant, the fire chief of Hopkinton, concluding that the plain language of § 261 requires the sprinkler system. The plaintiff appealed. We transferred the case to this court on our own motion and affirm.

I

In 1988, the plaintiff obtained a permit from the Hopkin*71ton zoning board of appeals to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Massachusetts Hospital Ass'n v. Department of Medical SecurityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1992
  2. Gateley's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1993
  3. Fire Chief v. State Building Code Appeals BoardMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1993

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Maimaron v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2007
  2. Veksler v. Board of Registration in DentistryMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1999
  3. Benson's CaseMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1999
  4. Tierney v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2003
  5. Cotter v. City of BostonDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1999

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API