Legal Opinion

Roller v. Smith

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided November 18, 1975No. 1999PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HERNANDEZ, Judge.

This case involves the responsibility of an agent acting for a disclosed principal to the third party. Plaintiffs, the third parties, appeal from a judgment dismissing their complaint. We affirm.

Plaintiffs and defendants entered into a written agreement for the sale of a Toyota automobile. The agreement, dated November 11, 1971, reads in pertinent part as follows :

“The undersigned Ralph S. Roller hereby acknowledges receipt of $150. cash from Alice Luna and Spencer Smith as agents for the Committee to Save Black Mesa, said $150. being downpayment on the purchase of…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kitchen v. SchusterNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Lake City Stevedores, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross v. East West Shipping Agencies, Inc., Defendant-Appellant-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
  3. Ellis v. StoneNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1916

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Romero v. Mervyn'sNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Barnes v. Sadler Associates, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Fryar v. Employers Ins. of WausauNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Roller v. SmithNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API