Fryar v. Employers Ins. of Wausau
New Mexico Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SOSA, Chief Justice.
The general issues presented in this case are (1) whether the insurance broker had authority to modify an insurance contract for an insurance company, and (2) if he did, whether the insureds reasonably relied to their detriment upon representations by the broker. We hold that under the facts of this case the broker was an agent of the insurance company and legally bound the company to a modification of the insurance contract.
Plaintiff-appellees Lem and Danny Fryar (Fryars) entered into a partnership to conduct a logging business in September of 1973. The Fryars were…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Continental Life Insurance v. ChamberlainSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Brown v. CooleyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1952
- St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. ShaverSupreme Court of Iowa · 1888
- Raulie v. Jackson-Horne Grocery, Ltd.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1944
- Petersen v. Pacific American FisheriesWashington Supreme Court · 1919
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Gallegos v. Citizens Insurance AgencyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1989
- Barron v. Evangelical Lutheran Good Samaritan SocietyNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2011
- Teague-Strebeck Motors, Inc. v. Chrysler InsuranceNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1999
- Topmiller v. CainNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1983
- Casarez v. GarciaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1983
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.