State v. Cockroft, Unpublished Decision (2-24-2005)
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
{¶ 1} Anthony Cockroft, defendant-appellant, appeals from a judgment of the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas, in which he was found guilty of aggravated robbery, in violation of R.C. 2911.01, which is a first-degree felony; aggravated murder with specification, in violation of R.C. 2903.01; attempted murder, in violation of R.C. 2903.02, which is a first-degree felony; and tampering with evidence, in violation of R.C.2921.12, which is a third-degree felony.
{¶ 2} On September 26, 2003, appellant, Mario Barfield, Brandon Washington, and Shawn Atchley planned a robbery. They decided…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- State v. ThompkinsOhio Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. JenksOhio Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. MartinOhio Court of Appeals · 1983
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- In re Ohio Criminal Sentencing Statutes CasesOhio Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. AekinsOhio Court of Appeals · 2023
- State v. Brodbeck, 08ap-134 (12-31-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
- State v. CockroftOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
- State v. Cockroft, 06ap-752 (5-3-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.