State v. Cockroft, 06ap-752 (5-3-2007)
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
{¶ 1} Defendant-appellant, Anthony Cockroft, appeals from an entry of the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas which re-sentenced defendant following the Supreme Court of Ohio's remand of his original sentence pursuant to State v. Foster, 109 Ohio St.3d 1, 2006-Ohio-856.
{¶ 2} Resolution of defendant's assignment of error requires only a brief recitation of the facts. Following an incident on February 27, 2003, defendant was indicted for aggravated robbery, aggravated murder, attempted murder, and tampering with evidence.
A jury later found defendant guilty as charged in the indictment.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. FosterOhio Supreme Court · 2006
- United States v. LanierSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Moskal v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- In re Ohio Criminal Sentencing Statutes CasesOhio Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. Fout, Unpublished Decision (2-13-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. CockroftOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
- State v. CockroftOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
- State ex rel. Cockroft v. McIntoshOhio Court of Appeals · 2016
- State v. CockroftOhio Court of Appeals · 2017
- State v. Kerns, 06ca3124 (7-27-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007