Legal Opinion

State v. Cockroft, 06ap-752 (5-3-2007)

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided May 3, 2007No. 06AP-752PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

{¶ 1} Defendant-appellant, Anthony Cockroft, appeals from an entry of the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas which re-sentenced defendant following the Supreme Court of Ohio's remand of his original sentence pursuant to State v. Foster, 109 Ohio St.3d 1, 2006-Ohio-856.

{¶ 2} Resolution of defendant's assignment of error requires only a brief recitation of the facts. Following an incident on February 27, 2003, defendant was indicted for aggravated robbery, aggravated murder, attempted murder, and tampering with evidence.

A jury later found defendant guilty as charged in the indictment.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. FosterOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  2. United States v. LanierSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  3. Moskal v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. In re Ohio Criminal Sentencing Statutes CasesOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  5. State v. Fout, Unpublished Decision (2-13-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. CockroftOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
  2. State v. CockroftOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
  3. State ex rel. Cockroft v. McIntoshOhio Court of Appeals · 2016
  4. State v. CockroftOhio Court of Appeals · 2017
  5. State v. Kerns, 06ca3124 (7-27-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API