Legal Opinion

Rotch's Wharf Co. v. Judd

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided October 15, 1871PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Tort for trespassing on a close in Hew Bedford of the plaintiffs, who were a corporation chartered by the St. of 1831, a. 88. Writ dated August 28,1869. The answer justified the acts that constituted the alleged trespass, under a claim of a right of way in Benjamin Rodman, and his tenants and agents, to cross the close for access to a warehouse on adjoining land which the defendant occupied as Rodman’s tenant under a lease dated in 1869. At the trial in the superior court,…

Read the full summary

Tort for trespassing on a close in Hew Bedford of the plaintiffs, who were a corporation chartered by the St. of 1831, a. 88. Writ dated August 28,1869. The answer justified the acts that constituted the alleged trespass, under a claim of a right of way in Benjamin Rodman, and his tenants and agents, to cross the close for access to a warehouse on adjoining land which the defendant occupied as Rodman’s tenant under a lease dated in 1869. At the trial in the superior court, before Scudder, J., the defendant sought to prove the right of way by evidence of an open, adverse and uninterrupted use…

1Opinion of the CourtChapman, C. J.

The first four exceptions relate to the questions put to William J. Rotch, a witness for the plaintiffs,- and his answers. To understand them properly, it is necessary to advert to the points to which they relate, and the situation of the witness. The defendant claimed a right of way over the wharf to a warehouse which he occupied under a lease from Benjamin Rod* *227man, and contended that Rodman had acquired the right by adverse user. The wharf was open and uninclosed, and used as a public wharf. The witness was a nephew of Rodman, had known the locus since 1845, and for ten or fifteen years…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bank of United States v. DandridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1827
  2. Lowe v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1860

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Chicago Telephone Co. v. Northwestern Telephone Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Indiana Pipe Line Co. v. ChristensenIndiana Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Inhabitants of Deerfield v. Connecticut River RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1887
  4. Zulver Realty Co. v. SnyderCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1948
  5. Bank v. Lumber Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1889

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API