Legal Opinion

Baldwin v. Grier Bros.

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided July 7, 1914No. 26PublishedCited by 6 opinions

In Equity. Suit by Frederick E. Baldwin and the John Simmons Company against the Grier Bros. Company. On final hearing.

1Opinion of the Court

ORR, District Judge.

The plaintiffs by their bill charge the defendant with infringement of reissue patent of the United States, No. 13,542, issued to.Frederick E. Baldwin for an acetylene gas generating lamp under date of March 11, 1913, and have also charged the defendant with unfair competition in trade in marketing an unfair copy of a portable miner’s acetylene lamp known as the “Baldwin” lamp. The defendant has denied the validity of the patent, upon the ground, as it alleges in the answer, that the said reissue patent and the original patent No. 821,580 were fully anticipated in the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Bleser v. BaldwinCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1912

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. John Simmons Co. v. Grier Brothers Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
  2. Baldwin v. Abercrombie & Fitch Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1915
  3. Baldwin v. Abercrombie & Fitch Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1915
  4. Grier Bros. v. BaldwinCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1915
  5. Eisenstadt Mfg. Co. v. J. M. Fisher Co.District Court, D. Rhode Island · 1916

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API