Legal Opinion

Jackson v. Jackson

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided July 1, 1892PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from Lauderdale Chancery Court. Heard before Hon. Thomas Cobbs. The former appeal in this case is reported in 84 Ala, p. 343. The facts fully appear in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtColeman, J.

— The facts of the case may be briefly stated as follows: Elizabeth Jackson deposited eight hundred and eighty dollars with Jackson Bros. Upon their refusal to return the money, after demand, she began an action at law in the Circuit Court for its recovery.

Felix E. Jackson one of the complainants was a member of the firm of Jackson Bros. He and his brother Frank Jackson, as administrator of A. E. Jackson, deceased, filed the present bill in the Chancery Court, claiming the money as the property of their intestate A. E. Jackson, and upon sufficient allegations obtained a temporary injunction,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Calhoun v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1876
  2. Young v. East Ala. Railway Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1885
  3. Powell v. Robinson & LedyardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1884
  4. Crosswell v. Lehman, Durr & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1875

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Murphy v. OlberdingSupreme Court of Iowa · 1899
  2. Farmers' Union Warehouse Co. v. BarnettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API