Legal Opinion
Hays v. Hudson
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided September 7, 1973No. 9669PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
McMANUS, Chief Justice.
This suit was brought in the District Court of Santa Fe County to recover on a promissory note, to foreclose an assignment as collateral given as security for the note and for the sale of the property covered by the assignment as collateral. After trial by the court, judgment was entered in favor of the plaintiff on the note. Defendant appeals and plaintiff has cross-appealed.
Hudson, defendant, signed a promissory note in the amount of $52,068.00 bearing interest at the rate of 11.5% per annum, and assigned certain collateral in the form of two promissory notes…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Garver v. Public Service Company of New MexicoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
- Armijo v. HenryNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1907
- American Inv. Co. v. LyonsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1923
- Priestley v. Law Et Ux.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1927
- Pope v. Lydick Roofing Company of AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1970
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Turner v. Aldens, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1981
- Doe Ex Rel. Doe v. HeimNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1976
- Richardson Ford Sales, Inc. v. JohnsonNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1984
- Maulsby v. MagnusonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1988
- First National Bank v. DanekNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1976
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.