Legal Opinion

Priestley v. Law Et Ux.

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided September 5, 1927No. 3011PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

WATSON, J.

Charles A. Law and Alice- M. Law appeal from a judgment of foreclosure and sale rendered upon certain instruments given by them and held by the Union Trust & Savings Bank of Clayton as security for their notes. The judgment also denied them relief prayed for by their cross-complaint. After the commencement of the suit D. W. Priestley was appointed receiver of the Union Trust & Savings Bank and was substituted as plaintiff. It will be convenient to refer to the parties according to their status in the court below.

Bji- the answer defendants admitted the execution…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. McKnightNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1915
  2. State v. CarabajalNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Armijo v. HenryNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1907
  4. American Inv. Co. v. LyonsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1923
  5. State v. LazarovichNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1921

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Transwestern Pipe Line Company v. YandellNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1961
  2. State v. StewartNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Hall v. Boise Payette Lumber Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Ferret v. FerretNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1951
  5. State v. TrujilloNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1955

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API