Legal Opinion

Rubsam v. Harley C. Loney Co.

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided September 20, 1949No. Civ. A. No. 8136PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THORNTON, District Judge.

The complaint filed in this cause is a contract action based upon certain patent license agreements referred to therein, granting exclusive rights to the plaintiff upon certain patents relating to balancing weights for vehicle wheels, principally' automobiles, in the so-called original production field, that is by motor car manufacturers, as distinct from the “service field”. The relief asked is an injunction against defendant invading plaintiff’s exclusive license, accounting for royalties not paid, and assessments of costs. Questions of validity or invalidity or…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Leman v. Krentler-Arnold Hinge Last Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. General Electric Co. v. Marvel Rare Metals Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
  3. Stonite Products Co. v. Melvin Lloyd Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
  4. Crosley Corp. v. Westinghouse Electric & Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1942
  5. Dewey & Almy Chemical Co. v. Johnson, Drake & Piper, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1939

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Global Shipping and Trading, Ltd. v. Verkhnesaldincky Metallurgic Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Kline v. Zueblin (In Re American Export Group International Services, Inc.)District Court, District of Columbia · 1994
  3. Newell v. O. A. Newton & Son Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1950
  4. Rubsam v. Harley C. Loney Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API