Legal Opinion

State v. . Wynne

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 5, 1896PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The defendant Wynne was indicted, under The Code, sec. 991, for unlawfully receiving and consenting to receive money for an illegal purpose, to-wit, to discharge (1207) a prisoner then in his custody for a crime committed, said Wynne being then a special constable, duly appointed under the law of the State; and the defendant Oxendine is indicted for being present, aiding and abetting the unlawful act of the defendant Wynne. The defendants were convicted, and appealed. The defendants contend that the indictment was insufficient, because it uses the words "did receive and consent to receive,"…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. . Van DoranSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1891
  2. State v. . DulaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1888
  3. State v. . McEntyreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1842
  4. State v. . ColeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. GreerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  2. State v. WappensteinWashington Supreme Court · 1912
  3. State v. . McDraughonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
  4. Ex Parte A.S. ShepherdCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1913
  5. State v. MayCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API