Legal Opinion
State v. May
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
Decided June 5, 1979No. 7920SC84PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MORRIS, Chief Judge.
Defendant presents five arguments in support of his nine assignments of error. We will address each assignment of error in the order in which they are discussed by the parties in their briefs.
The validity of the search warrant, which was the means of retrieving the .410 gauge shotgun and the frozen meat from defendant’s store, has been challenged on the grounds that the af*373fidavit and application for the search warrant failed to establish probable cause for the issuance of the warrant. The application provides in part as follows:
“On April 27, 1978 at 3:15 P.M., I, Det. Lt.…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- United States v. VentrescaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- State v. McClainSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- State v. CampbellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. HaymondCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
- State v. ByerlyIdaho Court of Appeals · 1985
- State v. ByerlyIdaho Court of Appeals · 1985