Legal Opinion

United States v. Yehuda Draiman

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided February 21, 1986No. 85-1995PublishedCited by 83 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HARLINGTON WOOD, Jr., Circuit Judge.

The defendant, Yehuda Draiman, a principal stockholder, attempted to take advantage of the burglary of Electro Video Marketing (“EVM”) which occurred in Chicago, Illinois in August, 1981. Thereafter, Draiman filed on behalf of EVM two burglary insurance claims with the insurers, Transamerica and Hartford Insurance Companies. The government alleged that the insurance claims were fraudulent, being far in excess of actual losses, and charged Draiman with ten counts of mail fraud, two counts of obstruction of justice, and one count of perjury. A jury found…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. United States v. YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Pereira v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  4. Alford v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  5. Rubin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by83 opinions

  1. United States v. James P. HickokCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
  2. United States v. Marvin Leo BeasleyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
  3. United States v. Thomas YorkCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
  4. United States v. Jerry WhaleyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
  5. United States v. James P. LedonneCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994

78 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API