Legal Opinion

Matter of Marriage of Plaster

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 25, 1982No. 37441, CA 18945PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVan Hoomissen, J.

Wife appeals a decree of dissolution, contending that the property division and spousal support awards are inequitable and that the award of attorney’s fees to her was insufficient. We review de novo, ORS 19.125(3), and modify the decree.

The parties were married 25 years and raised four children. Husband has worked for a utility for 20 years. When the case was tried in 1980, husband was earning $1,100 monthly net pay. He enjoyed the usual fringe benefits customarily provided to employes of a utility. Wife worked primarily at home during the marriage. Her sporadic outside employment consisted…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. In Re the Dissolution of the Marriage of GroveOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  2. In Re the Dissolution of the Marriage of GroveOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Matter of Marriage of RogersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
  4. Matter of Marriage of RogersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
  5. In re the Marriage of RogersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Marriage of Sinn v. SinnSupreme Court of Colorado · 1985
  2. Matter of Marriage of SteinbrennerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
  3. In re the Marriage of AshCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
  4. In re the Marriage of BatisteCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
  5. In re the Marriage of HutchesonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API