Legal Opinion

Hester v. Bull

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 9, 1932Published

1Per curiam

For the reasons given in Martin v. Bull (236 App. Div. 637), decided herewith, the order should be reversed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion to consolidate granted, with ten dollars costs.

Present — Finch, P. J., Merrell, Martin, Sherman and Townley, JJ.

Order reversed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, and motion to consolidate granted, with ten dollars costs.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Martin v. BullAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932