Martin v. Bull
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Per curiam
The plaintiff is entitled to a consolidation of these actions, so that the whole matter may be disposed of at one trial. If the plaintiff herein should successfully establish the counterclaim which was interposed in the Municipal Court action in which she is defendant, the recovery would be limited to the sum of $1,000 (Mun. Ct. Code, § 86).
Where it is apparent that there is no merit in a counterclaim, an application to consolidate should be denied. However, on the record before us, we cannot say that this is such a case. At the trial the defendant should be given the right to open and close.
T…
2Cited by3 opinions
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. McGuire & Co.New York Supreme Court · 1937
- 2525-7th Ave. Corp. v. KnightAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940
- Hester v. BullAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932