Legal Opinion

Stackhouse v. Schneider

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided May 26, 1989No. 88-163PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MACK, Associate Judge:

This appeal presents the narrow issue of when the statute of limitations for bringing an action under the Compulsory No-Fault Motor Vehicle Insurance Act of 1982, D.C. Code § 35-2101 et seq. (1985 Supp.) 1 begins to run. All parties agree that the general Code provision 2 would prohibit an action “for which a limitation is not otherwise specifically prescribed” from being brought after three years from the time the right to maintain the action accrues. We reject appellees’ contention that the action in this case accrued at the time of injury. We hold that the statute of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Bussineau v. President of Georgetown CollegeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. Dimond v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1986
  3. Ehrenhaft v. Malcolm Price, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. Knight v. FurlowDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
  5. Shehyn v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ward v. Nationwide Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1992
  2. Matter of BanksDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
  3. Jameson v. KingDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
  4. Savini v. University of Hawai'iHawaii Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Ward v. Nationwide Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API