Legal Opinion

Estate of Earnest Lee Boyland v. United States Department of Agriculture

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided March 16, 2017No. Civil Action No. 2015-1112PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

TANYA S. CHUTKAN, United States District Judge

In this case brought under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000d, and the Fifth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, ■ Plaintiffs allege that they have been discriminated against by Defendants U.S. Department of Agriculture (“USDA”) and Epiq Class Action & Claims Solutions, Inc. in the denial of their administrative discrimination claims. Before the court are Defendants’ motions to dismiss. (ECF Nos. 5,18). For the reasons stated below, both motions are GRANTED.

I. BACKGROUND

Plaintiffs in this case are the…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Dolly Kyle Browning and Direct Outstanding Creations Corporation v. William Jefferson ClintonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2002

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Estate of Boyland v. U.S. Dep't of Agric.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2019
  2. Ndiaye v. United States of AmericaDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API