Estate of Earnest Lee Boyland v. United States Department of Agriculture
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
TANYA S. CHUTKAN, United States District Judge
In this case brought under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000d, and the Fifth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, ■ Plaintiffs allege that they have been discriminated against by Defendants U.S. Department of Agriculture (“USDA”) and Epiq Class Action & Claims Solutions, Inc. in the denial of their administrative discrimination claims. Before the court are Defendants’ motions to dismiss. (ECF Nos. 5,18). For the reasons stated below, both motions are GRANTED.
I. BACKGROUND
Plaintiffs in this case are the…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Dolly Kyle Browning and Direct Outstanding Creations Corporation v. William Jefferson ClintonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2002
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Estate of Boyland v. U.S. Dep't of Agric.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2019
- Ndiaye v. United States of AmericaDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2021