Legal Opinion

Leaman Transportation Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 13, 1954No. Appeals, Nos. 67, 68 and 69PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Rhodes, P. J.,

These appeals are by competing carriers from an order of the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission enlarging the rights of Seaboard Tank Lines, Inc., as *555a motor carrier of petroleum products in tank vehicles, and granting it a certificate of public convenience to transport such products, as a Class D carrier, between any two points in Pennsylvania within one hundred fifty miles of the Borough of Macungie, Lehigh County. The authority granted was in lieu of former complex, detailed, lesser rights held by Seaboard which covered in part the same territory.

From its…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Pittsburgh & Lake Erie Railroad v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  2. Zurcher v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  3. Kulp v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
  4. Follmer Trucking Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  5. Highway Express Lines, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1948

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. D. F. Bast, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  2. Modern Transfer Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  3. Garner v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  4. Noerr Motor Freight Inc. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  5. Modern Transfer Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API