Spence & Goldstein v. Clay
Supreme Court of Louisiana
1Opinion of the CourtSt. Paul, J.
This is a suit to enforce a mortgage via ordinaria upon property belonging to minors. The defense is that the money was borrowed for speculative purposes and the minors are not bound. R. C. C. arts. 339, 340, authorizes the mortgage of minor’s property on the advice of a family meeting. Act No. 110 of 1920 (Cf. Act No. 319 of 1926) authorizes the judge having jurisdiction over the minors to act for said minors in any matter whatsoever without the advice of a family meeting, whenever the 'tutor shall lay before him in detail what he proposes to do on behalf of said minors, and the undertutor…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Scottish American Mortgage Co. v. OgdenSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1896
- Hall v. WoodsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1849
- Williams v. ChotardSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1856
- Cane v. CawthonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1880
- Pilie v. StewartSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1839
3Cited by1 opinion
- Succession of FontanoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1941